Search for: "State v. Roselle" Results 21 - 40 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2015, 3:19 am
Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the Board "was entitled to consider the effect its decision would have as a precedent" (Matter of Gallo v Rosell, 52 AD3d 514, 516). [read post]