Search for: "State v. Rowles"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm
In 2005, Ms Rowling obtained a further injunction (in an unreported decision) in respect of the next book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Nucci v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Rowling. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
The Daily Mail has printed an apology to the author JK Rowling in which it states that it has paid her substantial damages over an article that claimed she had told a misleading “sob story. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:18 am
In last week’s case (Heyman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
Mother Caroline's latest privacy quest before the ECHR (Case of von Hannover v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Q. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:04 am
Break-and-enter charges dropped, East Gwillimbury daughter finally moves into late dad's home ‘Harry Potter’ author JK Rowling settles suit against lawyer who disclosed she wrote new novel Appeals court sides with college athletes in suit over licensing rights on video game U.S. prosecutors argue Manning’s leaks changed how military allows analysts to access data Sammy Yatim ‘wasn’t stable,’ says witness on streetcar B.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
While the defendant’s petition for rehearing was pending, the Circuit decided Rowling v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
Rowling sues for copyright infringement. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
This, as Rowles J.A. noted, “risks perpetuating the very disadvantage and exclusion from mainstream society theCode is intended to remedy” (see Brooks v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:51 am
In its decision the BVerfG stressed that (like all other cases) cases relating to under-age celebrities required a case-by-case balancing of the conflicting rights (freedom of expression v personality right). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
Raguin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm
As Lord Chief Justice Camden evocatively stated in Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Trials 1030, “the eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass”. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Harry Potter author JK Rowling told a shocking story, claiming a journalist had somehow slipped a note in one of her children’s’ schoolbags. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
In the decision of Raguin v. [read post]
