Search for: "State v. S. C. D."
Results 21 - 40
of 13,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
Hungary claimed, in particular, that Directive 2004/38 applied to all citizens of the Union, including Heads of State, and to all types of visits, that was to say, both official and private.The Court first of all stressed that citizenship of the Union was intended to be the fundamental status of nationals of the Member States (see, inter alia, Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk [2001]; Case C-135/08 Rottmann [2010]; and Case C-256/11 Dereci and Others [2011]).Art.… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
C. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:56 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm
To begin a state specific search, choose the first letter of the state you would like to search:A C D F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W Whether you are a government zoning official determining other city zoning regulations, a developer researching available land, or a concerned citizen investigating government issues, GovScan is here to help. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:21 pm
On March 26, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:21 pm
On March 26, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:53 am
Circuit’s decision in ACA International v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Nixon, Rule 17(c), and Colorado’s privacy standards (People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:09 am
Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (Case C-318/07); [2009] WLR (D) 27 “It was contrary to Community law to refuse income tax deductibility for a donation to a charity established in another member state where it was allowed in the case of charities established in the taxpayer's state and the taxpayer had no opportunity to show that the [...] [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:26 pm
S. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Mahamdia v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: (Case C-154/11); [2012] WLR (D) 218 “An embassy situated in a member state of the European Union was an ‘establishment’ within the meaning of article 18(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in the context of a dispute concerning a contract of employment concluded by the embassy on behalf of the sending state, where the functions carried out… [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:49 am
Article 3(d) states that an SPC must be based on "the first marketing authorisation" for the product. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:35 am
Huet v Université de Bretagne Occidentale (Case C-251/11); [2012] WLR (D) 71 “National legislation which provided for conversion of fixed-term employment contracts into an employment contract of indefinite duration when the fixed-term employment contracts reached a certain duration did not have to require that the employment contract of indefinite duration reproduced in identical terms the principal clauses set out in the previous contract. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
No way I'd have gotten 100% before reading the Ninth Circuit's opinion on the issue.Here's your bonus question: According to the Ninth Circuit this morning, are social workers in Washington State learned professionals? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
S. [read post]
