Search for: "State v. Saas" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Plaintiff sued only the City, but the SAA was an approval granted by non-party responsible agency CDFW, not the City. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm by Buckingham
In addition to e-commerce retailers, these new provision will have a significant impact on out-of-state SaaS providers and online platforms that connect sellers of taxable services to Ohio consumers. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
However, the new law seeks to broaden the scope of covered goods and services so as to include software as a service (Saas), audiovisual productions, biotechnology, nanotechnology, the aerospace industry, and various types of industry 4.0- related technologies. [read post]
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:47 am by Barry Sookman
In the United States, standing requires that the plaintiff either own the patent being asserted or at least have exclusive rights to the patent. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Another important case was handed down a week before Christmas: the decision by Judge Roland Sutherland in favour of Business Day, Moneyweb and City Press v South African Airways ([2015] ZAGPJHC 293 (SAA). [read post]