Search for: "State v. Saucier"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
Saucier v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
Saucier v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
’ Saucier v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
In Saucier v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272, 1285 (9th Cir. 2001),(quoting Saucier, 533 U.S. at 202). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:48 am
The most recent case, Sherron Associates Loan Fund V v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
Second, he states that the Court’s decision in Pearson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
In Saucier v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:18 am
However, Saucier [v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:54 am
Callahan (discussed here) overruled Saucier v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
Following the protocol for evaluating qualified immunity claims, see Saucier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:48 pm
Although the rule of Saucier v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:06 am
Back in 2001, in Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S596aCivil rights -- Search and seizure -- Qualified immunity -- Under two-step procedure for resolving government officials' qualified immunity claims mandated by Court in Saucier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily allowed into the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]