Search for: "State v. Steven D. Scott" Results 21 - 40 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am by Andy Schlafly
Marshall may end up like his then-respected successor as chief justice, Roger Taney, who authored the notorious Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Additional commentary comes from Scott Cosenza at Liberty Nation and Caroline Mala Corbin at Take Care. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Scott Skinner-Thompson and Kate Levine argue that even after Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Steven Mazie writes at The Economist that if the abortion providers lose, “the consequences could be profound, emboldening anti-abortion legislators in many states to pass new laws squeezing access to abortion. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]