Search for: "State v. T. Costa" Results 21 - 40 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Judge Gregg Costa, joined by six other judges, wrote that “[t]he Supreme Court’s message is unmistakable: Courts should not assign federal criminal statutes a ‘breathtaking scope’ when a narrower reading is reasonable. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
Posted on Car Accident Law Blog / Blog / Ultimate Guide to NHTSA v IIHS Testing Ratings Efforts to guarantee passenger safety and improve vehicle standards have given birth to two main authorities in safety performance testing, which are: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Each of these independent vehicle safety bodies is responsible for conducting a new car assessment program on vehicles about to enter the market using… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
I don't pretend these numbers are indicative of much. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Katherine Pompilio
We know that you have hired a data recovery specialist, don’t try to find workarounds. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
ReferencesAlban, L., Poulsen, M.K., Petersen, J.V., Lindegaard, L.L., Meinert, L., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm by Bob Ambrogi
Others don’t innovate, so you don’t benefit from current, best-in-class solutions. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm by Bob Ambrogi
Others don’t innovate, so you don’t benefit from current, best-in-class solutions. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court determines that the potential harm to Plaintiff outweighs the prejudice to Defendant and the public interest for pretrial hearings.[25] Likewise, courts might allow pseudonymity while a settlement seems to be looming, but saying "[t]his is subject to change if the settlement craters. [read post]