Search for: "State v. TM"
Results 21 - 40
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
To state a claim, Gibson needed to say which acts were performed by which defendant. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:57 pm
Therefore, s.12(3) HRA (which states there must be no relief that would restrain publication which would affect the exercise of an ECHR right, unless the applicant is likely to establish that publication should not be allowed) was not satisfied, and interim relief could be granted.Whether it should be granted depended ultimately on the balance of convenience. [read post]
8 May 2018, 10:56 am
What if Coco Chanel had been the plaintiff in Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
On 8 October 2010, the Registrar registered the assignment and Mediaquest became the owner of TM No. 741047. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 1:09 pm
The October 23, 2018 published trial court case of TM v RMW involved a heavy fact-intensive inquiry by the court in determining whether a restraining order was warranted. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) CRC Credit Fund Ltd & Ors v GLG Investments Plc (Sub-Fund: European Equity Fund) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 917 (02 August 2010) TM (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 (30 July 2010) Sheffield City Council v Wall (Personal Representatives of) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 922 (30 July 2010) ZA (Nigeria) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
East West, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:40 am
Gevo, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:59 am
Profoot, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Nike v. [read post]
