Search for: "State v. Tenny" Results 21 - 40 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm by war
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm by Woodrow Pollack
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
The Council’s second proposal on fee-shifting, circulated in early March 2015, [1] is much like their first, circulated in May 2014 in the wake of ATP Tour v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am by Broc Romanek
Deutscher Tennis Bund (which held that fee-shifting bylaws were permissible). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Keith Reinfeld
United States Tennis Association and was filed in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:13 pm by Cicely Wilson
” Accordingly, the court granted the petition.Read More: Comcast Wins TV Tennis SuitSAMS Hotel Grp., LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:32 am by Winiviere G. Sy
Pursuant to In re Merrick V., 122 Cal.App.4th 235 (2004), the court stated that ". . .leaving a 12 year old home alone posed a substantial risk of harm. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:59 am
This post isn't even going to try to explain the invention and the details of the patent in its pristine and putatively amended state. [read post]