Search for: "State v. Troutman" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Plaintiffs will now regularly plead that their state law claims against device manufacturers run "parallel" to the FDA's requirements and so are not preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013];see also W.W. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
Neither this Court nor the motion court is " required to shut its eyes to the patent falsity of a defense' " (id., quoting MRI Broadway Rental v United States Min. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The contract's merger clause precludes petitioner's reliance on communications between the parties and other extrinsic sources to support its proposed definition (see Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The contract's merger clause precludes petitioner's reliance on communications between the parties and other extrinsic sources to support its proposed definition (see Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013]). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm by Brian Wm. Higgins
" Dabney Carr (Troutman Sanders), Summary Judgment Awarded in First EDVA Trademark Decision Since Rosetta Stone (May 15, 2012): "The [Wag’N Enters., LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]