Search for: "State v. Wahl" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
  And choice of law can be a big issue – like in two recent MDL cases:  Wahl v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM systemKatfriend Darren Meale reports on the CJEU decision Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelinwhich upheld tyre giant Continental’s appeal against Michelin, concerning their stylised registered mark ‘X’.The challenge of protecting a database without a sui generis right, this time from SingaporeKat friends Lau Kok Keng, Nicholas Lauw and Jiamin Leow report on… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
  * Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
On July 27, Germany's Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof - BGH) referred a new copyright case to the Court of Justice of the European Union: I ZR 228/15 - Reformistischer Aufbruch – see the report brought by IPKat Eleonora Rosati.AG Wahl says that, at certain conditions, suppliers of luxury goods may prohibit retailers from selling on third-party online platformsIPKat Eleonora Rosati, timely as always, summarises the recent opinion of Advocate General in Coty… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
 Fourth, the Court determined that, because the Appellate Division’s opinion in State v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am by John Culhane
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]