Search for: "State v. Wardwell"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2019, 4:32 am
Exeter Law Group LLP v Immortalana Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
” “An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479, 482; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
"Plaintiff has stated a cause of action for legal malpractice by alleging that "but for" defendant's failure to prepare and procure documents necessary to provide him with a first-priority security interest, he would have been able to recover the amounts owed to him by the defaulting borrower (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Fenrich of Davis Polk & Wardwell presented the defense position. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
” On March 23, 2022, in Weston Family Partnership v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
” On March 23, 2022, in Weston Family Partnership v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
(Columbia University), on Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Tags: Anti-corruption, Corporate crime, FCPA, Incentives, Management, Misconduct, Non-prosecution agreement, Securities enforcement, Whistleblowers Another Year of Virtual Shareholder Meetings Posted by Brian V. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Sandler is a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and co-head of the firm’s global corporate governance group. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:34 am
Ramos v Goldberg, Schudieri & Lindenberg, P.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:48 am
.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
“A legal malpractice claim requires that the plaintiff show that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession which results in actual damages to a plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence” (AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]… [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract, an account stated, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
Matter of Garraway v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1301, 1301 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 864 [2013]; Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878, 879 [2006]). [read post]
