Search for: "State v. Weary"
Results 21 - 40
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
The reliance on Ludgate House Litd v Ricketts (Valuation Officer) (2020) EWCA Civ 1637 (our note) was misplaced. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
In Taking Offense v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:31 pm
The case, Stewart v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm
This could mean that Republicans — state attorneys general as well as the Trump Administration — may find failure in California v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 5:44 pm
Laufer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:29 am
Laufer v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 9:46 am
One of the clearest rebukes of this theory under Massachusetts law so far came from the state’s Business Litigation Session on March 31, 2020, in Jinks v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:29 am
State of Indiana v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:59 pm
And the Court -- weary of being perceived as coddling child molesters -- makes clear that it's just saying that the trial court shouldn't have granted a demurrer, and instead should take evidence about whether the statute indeed constitutionally advances a legitimate state interest as applied to that group of patients.Nonetheless, as a practical matter, at least while the lawsuit's pending -- which practically means, for years -- unless you want to be turned… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:17 pm
Our earlier post sets the stage for the case argued today before the SCOTUS; a case straight out of New York City.This recent case, known as New York State Rifle and Pistol Owners v New York City, involves a relatively strict local ordinance banning transportation of personally owned firearms within the city. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
” Last week, EBG achieved an impressive victory, obtaining a complete dismissal of a serial plaintiff’s class action complaint in the case Castillo v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:45 am
Baumann argued that, because the Operating Agreement is silent concerning the appointment or replacement of a managing agent, Rubin’s claim is governed by the default rule in LLC Law § 408(a) stating that management shall be “by affirmative vote of a majority of the managers. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:47 am
Case citation: Bardales v. [read post]
