Search for: "State v. Worm" Results 21 - 40 of 208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
In turn, the proposed Article 6a of Rome II establishes that: “[…] the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of the damage sustained shall be the law determined pursuant to Article 4(1), unless the person seeking compensation for damage chooses to base his or her claim on the law of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred or on the law of the country in which the parent company has its domicile or, where it does not have a domicile in a… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am by David Kris
Finally, Naksone writes that “[v]iolent extremist organizations have used the Internet to recruit terrorists, raise funds, direct violent attacks, and disseminate gruesome propaganda. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
The court declined to retain jurisdiction of state law claims and dismissed the case, though without prejudice to a state court filing of the state law claims. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am by Robert Chesney
In some states capital charges are available in some circumstances. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]