Search for: "State v. Yong" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am by Tian Lu
The IPKat is delighted to receive a guest post by Xi Lin (PhD candidate in IP law at Maastricht University) commenting on Jin Yong v Jiang Nan. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:03 am
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Farmer, Paul, Jim Yong Kim, Arthur Kleinman, and Matthew Basilico, eds. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s claim that he pleaded guilty to criminal charges in reliance on defendants’ negligent legal advice concerning the immigration consequences of the plea is barred by his guilty plea and lack of any claim of innocence (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 173 [1987]; Yong Wong Park v Wolff & Samson, P.C., 56 AD3d 351 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 704 [2009]). [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am by Adeline Chong
Two critical aspects of this Convention are that a choice of the court of a Contracting State is deemed to be exclusive unless there are express provisions to the contrary, and that the chosen court should assume jurisdiction unless the choice of court clause is invalid. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Convention provides an international benchmark for data protection and is legally binding on the member states who are signatories. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s claim that he pleaded guilty to criminal charges in reliance on defendants’ negligent legal advice concerning the immigration consequences of the plea is barred by his guilty plea and lack of any claim of innocence (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 173 [1987]; Yong Wang Park v Wolff & Samson, P.C., 56 AD3d 351[1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 704 [2009]). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jeffrey Kahn presented his observations from oral arguments in Georgia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman examined the flaws in the Article II analysis of Judge Roger Gregory concurring opinion in IRAP v. [read post]