Search for: "Steiner v. Steiner"
Results 21 - 40
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
Since the Portal-to-Portal Act amendments to the FLSA, a series of Supreme Court rulings have further defined the distinguishing line between compensable principal activities and non-compensable preliminary and postliminary tasks: Steiner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
., the opinion is binding precedent), got egg on its face in the case of Bryan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am
First, a member or shareholder seeking an accounting must establish that a pre-suit demand for such an accounting was made and refused (New York Studios, Inc. v Steiner Digital Studios, 151 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2017] [“In the absence of an allegation that plaintiffs demanded an accounting, the claim for an accounting fails to state a cause of action”]; Mawere v Landau, 130 AD3d 986, 990 [2d Dept 2015] [“The complaint failed to state a cause of action… [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:04 pm
by Dennis Crouch Thaler v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
First, plaintiff fails to set forth the terms of the BSF Retainer or the BRIR Retainer in the complaint that defendants allegedly breached (see Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP v Modell, 129 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2015] [dismissing the defendant client’s counterclaim for breach of contract because the defendant failed to identify the specific provision of the retainer in which the plaintiff law firm promised to produce a specific result]; Steiner v Lazzaro… [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 305; see Bishop v Maurer, 9 NY3d 910, 911). [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am
Opinion of Dr Richard Steiner, Honorary Research Fellow (Sch [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:35 am
The Steiner case awarded $25k on a default and OPG v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
