Search for: "Steve Pacer"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 10:05 pm
Have you had trouble using the federal court PACER system from an iPhone or iPad? [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm
Interesting, given the remarks and research of our friend Steve Schultze, Associate Director of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm
Interesting, given the remarks and research of our friend Steve Schultze, Associate Director of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
Reddit’s initial founders Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian absorbed Swartz and Infogami into Reddit. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:46 am
http://tinyurl.com/3q44rwe (Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley) How to Make Sure That 'Redacted' Document You Uploaded to PACER Is Really Redacted - http://tinyurl.com/44mrwh4 (Bruce Carton) Is the Plaintiff Required to “Friend” the Defense? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Pay My Costs - http://tinyurl.com/3gzlgy3 (Doug Austin) Encrypted and Hidden Files Put eDiscovery at Risk - http://tinyurl.com/3dh9ruj (Bill Tolson) FTC Announces Update to Online Advertising Guidelines -http://tinyurl.com/3e84638 (Jenna Greene) No Shirt, No Complaint, No Subpoena - http://tinyurl.com/43mk7q4 (Josh Gilliland) NY Appellate Division Affirms Spoliation Sanctions - http://tinyurl.com/3hncg4b (Christopher Daze One Privileged E-Mail in a Chain Does Not Protect All, Judge Rules -… [read post]
28 May 2011, 2:07 am
For more information on CITP’s PACER-related research, please see Stephen Schultze’s recent VoxPopuLII post, PACER, RECAP, and the Movement to Free American Case Law. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm
Hard to say, since no one is covering it and the court has not posted any updated pleadings -- or even minutes of the proceedings -- on PACER. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Steve Schultze – “Readers of this blog are probably already familiar with the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:46 pm
Schultze explains recent criticisms of PACER, the U.S. federal courts‘ fee-based documents database, and describes the efforts of technologists to improve public access to PACER documents. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:04 am
Today in VoxPopuLII, Steve Schultze of Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy talks about the history of the RECAP project. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:27 am
He called it PACER Recycling. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:03 am
According to Steve Schultze's working paper, PACER fees are covering court expenses that are not related to direct costs of maintaining PACER. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Less than 18% of the total income generated by PACER fees relate directly to the cost of running the service - that's according to a new working paper by Steve Schultze, Associate Director of the Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:43 am
http://managingmiracles.blogspot.com/2010/05/what-is-electronic-public-access-to.html by Steve Schultze, Associate Director of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton US Courts have long faced a dilemma. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:33 am
A recent blogpost by Steve Schultze, Assoc. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:57 am
Olson, who was filling in for Ray who is on vacation, ruled from the bench that transcripts could not be released until April 9, giving the Lippmans the chance to either appeal Ray’s order or file a motion for reconsideration.Here is the docket -- smart PACER kids, tell me where is Judge Ray's Order? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:11 pm
One subset of this effort is our work on PACER, the online document access system for the federal courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:54 am
Today, LII Director Tom Bruce will be part of a law.gov panel with legal-information activist Carl Malamud, VoxPop author and LII friend John Joergensen, and Steve Schultze of PACER-activism and RECAP fame. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Back in July I talked about a petition urging to improve PACER, the online access service to U.S. court records and documents. [read post]
