Search for: "Steven Brady" Results 21 - 40 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 11:35 am by Steve Hall
That rule was a mistake, Stevens said, especially given that political pressure gives prosecutors little incentive to train their underlings on Brady. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:40 am by admin
The judge found that the prosecutors repeatedly failed to turn over exculpatory material to the defense as required by Brady v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm by Erin Miller
  Over thirty-four Terms, Justice Stevens cited Brady in seventeen opinions (so far; nine were dissents). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
”  Throughout his entire career, Stevens has cited Brady v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:31 am by Joe Palazzolo
The review of the government’s files for Brady information was conducted by FBI and IRS agents, some of whom were unfamiliar with the facts or with Brady/Giglio requirements, unassisted and unsupervised by the prosecutors. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
Senator Ted Stevens that was marred by prosecutorial misconduct – have long issued their own individual Brady orders, but New York is the only jurisdiction that has made such orders mandatory for all criminal court judges. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:34 pm by John Steele
The article suggests that the fiasco was due to a mix of internal politics, bureaucracy, and bad judgment on the Brady issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:02 pm by Caleb Mason
” [Further],  during her review for Brady information in Stevens, she did not look for inconsistencies between a witness’s grand jury testimony and a witness’s statements reported in 302s. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:11 am by John Steele
In the wake of the Schuelke-Shields report on the failures in the prosecution of Senator Stevens, Ellen Podgor at White Collar Crime Prof Blog wonders if SCOTUS will take up a pending case that deals with alleged Brady failures. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:10 am by Solomon Wisenberg
There is no question that serious Brady violations occurred. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:38 am by Tony Mauro
 That outcome turned on the Court's finding that the prosecutor could not be held liable for failure to train his staff, based on a single violation of Brady v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:16 am
Justice Stevens, writing for a six justice majority, held that the state court's rejection of Cone's Brady claim is not barred from federal review, vacating the judgment of the Sixth Circuit below and remanding the case to the district court. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:50 pm by Bill Otis
 It's also scarcely news that the Department of Justice has found very serious failures in that regard by the prosecutors in the Ted Stevens corruption trial. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm by Madelaine Lane
The Court declined to exercise superintending control in Brady v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
Senator Ted Stevens will have ripple effects. [read post]