Search for: "Steven Griffin v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
United States and Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist’s “explainer” series, Steven Mazie explains how the Court selects its cases. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton looks at the possibility that state legislators can nullify the effect of last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
Indeed, three years after Jones, in Griffin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
Steven Mazie of Big Think discusses how Justice Kennedy might vote in Fisher v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at the Court’s recent decision in Lockhart v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, and Leslie Gielow Jacobs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas, comes from Marcia Coyle for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required) and Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, with commentary from David Gans at New Republic, Steven Mazie at The Economist, and Rick Hasen in the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Holland & Hart
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
At Big Think, Steven Mazie discusses last week’s oral argument in EEOC v. [read post]