Search for: "Steven Henning" Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[w]hen a Colorado ‘cake artist’ who refuses to serve same-sex weddings brings his case to the Supreme Court next month [in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Image is backyard chicken by Steven Johnson / CC BY 2.0 [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Peter Henning reports that “the Supreme Court will have two opportunities” —  in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:17 am
The following argument recap is by Steven Wu, an attorney at Akin Gump. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:49 am
Randy Henning, et al., Case Nos. 98,118 & 98,119 (argued 09/03/08). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:01 pm
So, says Peter Henning of the White Collar Crime Prof Blog, the greatest anxiety is being felt by Mel Weiss who, according to Henning, could face as much as ten years in prison. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
Justice Ginsburg wrote the lead dissent, in which Justices Stevens, Souter, and Breyer joined. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:31 pm
"[T]he sentencing process is fatally flawed," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in Abdul-Kabir, "[w]hen the jury is not permitted to give meaningful effect or a 'reasoned moral response' to a defendant's mitigating evidence. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:24 am by Ken Laino
The article by Steven Erlanger, Step hen Castle and Rick Gladstone, titled “Airing of Hidden Wealth Stirs Inquiries and Rage” — illustrates some of the disasters that strike when “hidden” assets are suddenly not hidden anymore. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:14 am by Usha Rodrigues
Con: Peter Henning argues internal controls matter for small corporations. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
”  And at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie criticizes the Court’s failure to explain the reasoning behind its original pre-dawn order last Saturday. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:10 pm
Note that four of the five justices who signed onto that statement signed onto this statement in 1996:[W]hen the punishment may be death, there are particular reasons to ensure that the men and women of the Armed Forces do not by reason of serving their country receive less protection than the Constitution provides for civilians.Loving, 517 U.S. at 774 (Stevens, J., concurring).So today four justices (Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer) said that they don't have to… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Steven Mazie covers “this showdown over presidential power” for The Economist. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 1:20 pm
Randy Henning, et al., Nos. 98,118 & 98,119State appeal (petition for review)Don W. [read post]