Search for: "Stevens v. Pitts" Results 21 - 26 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
The trial and appeals courts did not accept Mon River's argument that it, as a tower, only owed Ingram a tort-based duty of reasonable care under Stevens v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:40 am
Robert Stevens filed the case that came before the high court following his sentence to three years in prison for making videos on pitt bull fighting. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Stevens (08-769). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]