Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 21 - 40 of 700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
Lash's treatment of the legislative history of Section Three departs from these premises at a number of points. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
  These are known as “John Stings” or “Reverse Stings,” and technically referred to by the Department of Justice as “demand reduction interventions. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Stevens's opinion in Chevron did not explicitly link the two propositions in this fashion. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm by Guest Author
He is a former Chair of the ABA Section of Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, a former Public Member and now Senior Fellow at the Administrative Conference of the United States, and a Fellow at the National Academy of Public Administration. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
And this facial approach is rooted in longstanding precedent: In Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
When appointing Hur to lead the probe, Attorney General Merrick Garland cited the “extraordinary circumstances” of the Justice Department investigating the president as he considered a reelection bid. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Maloney (September 30, 2022) Department of Justice, Detailed Inventory of August 8, 2022 search Department of Justice, Revised Detailed Inventory (Sept. 26, 2022) Department of Justice, Privilege Review Team Inventory (filed [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]