Search for: "Stewart v. State of Indiana" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2018, 11:03 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 16105 (WD VA, Sept. 21, 2018), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a claim by a Mennonite inmate that he did not receive a diet compatible with his religious beliefs.In Stewart v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
This places US judges in the difficult position of acting as cultural gatekeepers, given that they have the final say as to what is worthy  of such protection.Judges themselves have noted  the challenge in being asked to rule on the protection of works of recognized stature [see Martin v City of Indiana(1999) ; Cheffins v Stewart(2016)]. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  The consortium consists of members of the law school and/or history faculties at the University of Minnesota, Indiana University, University of Illinois, University of Michigan, and the University of Pennsylvania in addition to the U of C and the ABF. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana:  U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 1:25 pm by Eva Arevuo
To set the table: 33 states have voter ID laws, 5 require specific kinds of photo ID and the most recent precedent on the issue is the 2008 Supreme Court case upholding Indiana’s law. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
"We came very close" to an agreement whereby he would limit his production to Indiana, he says. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Knight Foundation and the Surdna Foundation, which are supporting a $40 million effort to accelerate regional entrepreneurial ecosystems in Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, and New York. [read post]