Search for: "Stirling v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 8:38 am by Rachel Howie
[1] Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (PTY) Limited, and Stirling Capital Limited v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Imagine that an election were conducted according to the compact, and two or three states found themselves casting their electoral votes for candidates who had lost the popular vote in their states. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Similarly in architecture there is quotation: Konstantin Melnikov, Rusakov Club; quoted in James Stirling, Leicester Engineering Building. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
United States Just Security had a piece “Lawsuit against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Gathii, Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited, and Stirling Capital Limited v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” Finally, Mr Stirling submitted that there was nothing by way of antidote to the defamatory sting complained of. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]