Search for: "Stocking v. Ives"
Results 21 - 40
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 5:33 am
The recommendations suggested by the Committee include: i) alterations to the fund's "glide path illustration;" ii) adoption of a standard methodology for designing these illustrations; iii) increased prospectus disclosures; iv) marketing materials requirements; and v) expanded fee disclosures. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 12:04 am
CIM Real Estate Finance Trust reportedly acquired the two REITs in separate stock-for-stock, tax-free merger transactions. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
Anthony V. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
In SPP v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
Protective provisions give the preferred stock or a series of preferred stock the ability to block certain company actions. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:35 pm
” IV. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Part IV in this series will consider the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. 922(o) as applied to bump stocks. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Chief Judge Michel joined Parts I and V while Judge Gajarsa joined Parts II-IV. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:24 am
In the original Aruba Networks opinion, Vice Chancellor Laster determined that an efficient market existed for the target’s shares, given the following factors: (i) the presence of a significant amount of stockholders, (ii) the absence of a controlling stockholder, (iii) fulsome trading volume for the target’s stock, (iv) the broad dissemination of information about the target to the market, and (v) that the Court found that the target’s… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
Gensler outlined the SEC’s work in six areas of the equity markets: (i) minimum pricing increment; (ii) national best bid and offer; (iii) disclosure of order execution quality; (iv) best execution; (v) order-by-order competition; and (vi) payment for order flow, exchange rebates, and related access fees. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 7:35 pm
A company will want to ensure that certain types of stock issuances do not trigger anti-dilution protection. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:06 pm
[The other articles in this seven-part series are here: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VII.] [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
In Patel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
The Class F common stock protective provision basically provides: As long as any of the Class F common stock is outstanding, consent of the holders of at least 50% of the Class F common stock will be required for any action that (i) alters any provision of the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws if it would adversely alter the rights, preferences, privileges or powers of or restrictions on the Class F common stock; (ii) changes the authorized number… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Part IV discusses potential solutions, and implications if adopted, to discourage abuse from short-selling IPR petitioners by using solutions in current legislative proposals. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
The decision in Caraco v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 5:28 am
It is difficult to ignore that manic quality of the stock market. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:00 am
In Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
