Search for: "Stone v. Advantage Sales " Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Proposed Classes to be discussed: 4. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Discussion: there is not formally a post-sale confusion doctrine in the EU, but some suggest it is coming soon.) [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
”  There was, it follows, a lot of reputation for parties to take advantage of, including purchasing AdWords from Google which included Rosetta Stone’s trade marks. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
Of contemporary bands the Who and the Stones look like better bets ...]. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
Leaving no trade mark stone unturned, United Airlines sought summary judgment and alleged pretty well every kind of infringement known to European man -- same mark/same services; similar mark/same services and a likelihood of confusion and takng unfair advantage of its reputed marks without due cause, thereby diluting them. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A couple of cases use “contextual functionality”—Rosetta Stone: Google is using the mark for the functional purposes of locating things. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
You are aiming to remove stones and mud by a sieving action. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
Citing Thompson, Bongard, Mirowski, Kimbell, Stone, and (particularly) Schutt, the court found that Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Both the plaintiffs and the defense attorneys sought to leverage to their advantage the fact that Cheryl Foust's twin sister, Carol, was present and in good health in a Philadelphia Common Pleas courtroom Wednesday during opening arguments in Foust v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]