Search for: "Stone v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
I doubt the incremental new revenues will be more than a rounding error on Google's $50B of annual revenues. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:09 am
We certainly understand that city officials want to be cautious, given the drastic actions taken by federal prosecutors - including full-on SWAT raids of dispensaries, civil eviction actions and tax complications involving the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA, heard 1-2 December 2015. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
A unanimous three-justice panel dismissed a lawsuit against Rolling Stone brought by a class of indie rockers. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
* Copyright in Spain: a month without Google NewsSpanish IP enthusiast Míchel Olmedo Cuevas explains how humanity has fared in Spain, a month after the withdrawal there of the Google News service. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
The case was compromised with a Tomlin Order On 13 October 2023, Julian Knowles J handed handed down judgment in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
(Much of this is motivated by clickbait ad verticals designed to generate revenue). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74:… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
Subjecting an employee to internal and criminal investigations (Morshed v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Visit International News
Ready to Litigate Through the Clouds? [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
& Pol’y Rev. 356-390 (2010).Stone, Chad. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
This does require the court to do some fancy footwork to distinguish the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Antonin is a trial and appellate lawyer practicing in Toronto with a focus on international litigation and arbitration. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm
If the lawyer can display the ad, but the links are unethical, doesn’t that make the opinion internally inconsistent? [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 4:20 pm
In Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Bye-bye Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Cohen; Halperin v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
