Search for: "Stowe v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Petitioners ask whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
United States, 14-8358, the petitioner, a forty-six-year-old former aerobics instructor who claimed he became addicted to online porn while convalescing from a kidney transplant (it’s a familiar story), pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
We may have jumped the gun last week when we stated that Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
(Lozano v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
So, so much to talk about -- soon I hope to talk about a bunch of pieces, such as the dedication to Harriet Beecher Stowe, the fight that has shades of State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
’” Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
See also Marilyn Stowe's post, below.S v M [2012] EWHC (15 November 2012)Appeal by husband against maintenance order. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:50 pm
Stevenson and State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
A discussion of the R.P. and others v United Kingdom case (see above). [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Lawcast 203: Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am
The group received the necessary permits from the state and a Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit from the town. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:40 am
United States, ___A.3d ___, ___ (D.C. 2012). [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
James V. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
” See FCC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
The Court’s reasoning It was clear from the authorities (Abnett v British Airways Plc [1997] A.C. 430 and Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419) that the Montreal Convention had exclusivity in domestic law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]