Search for: "Strauss v. Horton"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
The plaintiffs' attorney, Waukeen McCoy, represented plaintiffs in the In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008).In Strauss v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
In November, ProtectMarriage.com / Yes on 8 opposed Liberty Counsel's motion to intervene on behalf of CCF in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:00 pm
Horton, 46 Cal.4th 364 (2009). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
Justice Moreno dissented in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:51 pm
Weideman Earlier today, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Strauss v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:19 am
CCF previously sought to intervene in Strauss v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:45 am
Horton. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
07/27/09 The Recorder (source: ADF Alliance Alert):Carlos Moreno stood alone in May when he dissented from the decision upholding Proposition 8 [Strauss v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
He recommends filing a state court action to challenge the California Supreme Court's holding, under Strauss v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Horton], has no effect on their marriage [Their marriage was licensed before Prop.8's adoption, and the Strauss Court upheld such marriages.] ... [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:24 am
TIME MAGAZINE picked up a piece published earlier this month in the SF Chronicle authored by two Pepperdine law profs who recommend that the California Supreme Court in Strauss v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:09 am
Horton, and to not defend it in the federal lawsuit, Perry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
In Strauss v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:53 am
Just two years ago, in Strauss v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
In Strauss v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:03 pm
Strauss v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Horton (2009) 46 Cal.4th 364. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Strauss v. [read post]