Search for: "Strickland v. American Can Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Allergan, Inc. 13-1379Issue: Whether, under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Coal Development Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Concepcion (precluding states from requiring arbitration procedures inconsistent with the FAA, even if based on public policy considerations) and American Express Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Strickland, 185 Ga. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
Still, there is something to be said when the most recent standard of effective counsel, as provided by the Supreme Court in Strickland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Becton, Dickinson and Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
Strickland, 185 Ga. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Boulder, CO L. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
We can identify the areas of the law that could change as a result of Justice Stevens’ departure. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm
See, e.g., Dyer v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
From this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court’s sweeping, albeit noncapital, decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Van Hook Issue: Under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Insofar as co-defendant's! [read post]
