Search for: "Strickland v. United States of America"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court rejected Riley's claim, holding that Riley's counsel was not deficient within the meaning of Strickland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council Harvey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
United States of America, decided on May 23. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
