Search for: "Strike 3 Holdings, LLC et al" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
I want to thank the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property for holding the referenced hearing. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for Joni Bey and Becky Rasawehr On February 11, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Joni Bey, et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am by Barry Sookman
The order made by Justice Gleeson, in a carefully reasoned decision in Bell Media Inc. et al v GOLDTV.BIZ 2019 FC 1432, ordered certain ISPs in Canada to block access to pirate subscription streaming sites (GoldTV.biz and GoldTV.ca) that were infringing the copyrights of the plaintiffs Bell Media Inc., Groupe TVA Inc, and Rogers media Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
  Upon the "third strike", sanctions may be taken. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
. * Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Zaslavskiy, et al, were charged by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with securities fraud in connection with several ICOs. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
By disallowing these abusive discovery practices, the Reform Act’s discovery stay essentially requires plaintiffs to have a valid basis for their claims before filing a lawsuit, which discourages strike suits. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 16.004 (a)(3) (“debt”), but an exception exists for a promissory note that satisfies the conditions of a negotiable instrument, which is subject to a six-year limitations period under the Texas version of the UCC. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm by Cicely Wilson
Vandergriff, et al., US 5th Cir. (7/14/14)Civil Rights, Constitutional LawPlaintiff filed suit alleging that the Board violated its First Amendment right to free speech when it denied plaintiff’s application for a specialty license plate featuring the Confederate battle flag. [read post]