Search for: "Strong v. Cook*"
Results 21 - 40
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
Therefore, In-N-Out did not have a strong legal argument against Caliburger in it’s 2012 suit as Caliburger was effectively just an international company and In-N-Out had to rely on international law. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
" The case is Pietrangelo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
” The general manager also observed that the person’s “walk and body style” were similar to those of Hampton, whom the general manager described as a “very clean, crisp, very mus[cl]y man, very, very strong powerful man. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:31 pm
” He also expressed his strong support for South Korea’s anti-monopoly push during a video conference with the Korea Communications Commission’s Chair, Han Sang-hyuk, on November 17. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:59 pm
Day 5 of the FTC v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am
In order to stick it to President Trump and any associates he may pardon, New York legislature moves to chip away at what had been strong protections against double jeopardy. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
Second, there is a strong presumption in federal copyright law against allowing circumvention of encrypted copyrighted software. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:01 pm
AQFTM, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 4:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed a 2008 Bolivar County defense verdict in Utz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
” M&S Industrial Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm
Hence there's a very strong Brady claim. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Last year, in Smith v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Gall v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
