Search for: "Sullivan et al v. Line "
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
SHC Laguna Niguel I, LLC et al, 2021 WL 2165208 (C.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Decided on December 22, 2009 Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1847 117179/07 [*1]Ted Moustakis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Christie’s, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Today the Supreme Court made an effort to clarify that line in AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
Successfully sued suggests that these cases were tried to a verdict, which in the case of Grillo v Pettiete et al Cause 96-145090-92 and Grillo v Henry Cause 96-167943-96 96th Dist, Ct Tarrant County, TX, simply wasn't true. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm
In the second case, Mohamad, et al., v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
This is especially so because, as my colleague Julie O'Sullivan has explained in a very informative recent article (96 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 643, 697-708 (2006)), the definitions of "corruptly" in these statutes are exceedingly vague and capacious, and could easily encompass such behavior . . . if it that's what happened.What gives me pause about the prospect of violations of sections 1505 and 1512, however, is that presumably Karl Rove, Harriet… [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
Sullivan. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
No harm, no foul is a good rule to live by. 233 Ga.App. 498 CHAMBLEY et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
Yet in laboratories all over the world, research has consistently shown that most commonsense behavioral cues are not diagnostic of truth and deception (DePaulo et al., 2003). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
The Brest et al. casebook does some of the best work of mixing constitutional law with constitutional history, for instance, and both Gunther/Sullivan and Stone/Seidman/et al. are terrific on references to other cases and to theoretical discussions. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan who would gladly have bankrupted the New York Times in a trumped-up defamation suit. [read post]
