Search for: "Superior Court v. Civil Service Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear the following four appeals this week:Jan. 16 — Federal Court — Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television & Radio Artists v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
A leading Canadian musical instrument retailer, Steve’s Music, has been ordered by the Ontario Superior Court to to pay more than $200,000.00 in damages, including $55,000 in moral and punitive damages, to a wrongfully terminated 59 year-old store manager with more than thirty years of service.In Altman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
The court, citing Koso v Greene, 260 NY 491, said that provisional employees, while appointed to positions in the competitive class, are “exempt from the civil service requirements for appointment; and similarly, so long as they hold such positions, they are entitled to none of the advantages secured by period of tenure under the [Civil Service Law]. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, “[a] divided Supreme Court said on Monday that a Colorado baker and cake artist was wrongly censored by the state of Colorado for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding party. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:04 am
As to his claim that he did not have proper notice or time to prepare for the hearing, the court commented that his attorney could have appeared on his behalf and raised these issues before the administrative tribunal.Dismissing his appeal, the Appellate Division noted that the Department was not required to state a reason for denying Salas reinstatement to his former police officer position.* §50.4(e) of the Civil Service Law, in pertinent part, provides that… [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
If a person ultimately found to have superior rights to retention was laid off and another individual having lesser rights to retention was continued in service instead, courts will usually award the individual who was laid off in error back salary and other benefits and the appointing authority would be directed to reinstate the individual retroactively to his or her former position as well.Layoffs from positions in the unclassified service: Layoffs of… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:41 am by William Gaskill
  Uhlig v Public Service Commission Uhlig sought review of Commission’s order approving water service schedules and rates. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]