Search for: "Supervisor #1 alleged, & #2" Results 21 - 40 of 2,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 9:20 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Plaintiff alleged in her Complaint that her employment was eventually terminated in retaliation for her reporting HIPAA violations to her supervisor earlier in the year. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  Hence, the elements of felony obstruction of justice are: (1) the defendant unlawfully and willfully, (2) obstructed justice, (3) with the intent to deceive. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
California repealed the law effective January 1, 2024, so the case is moot. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
 1) held the San Diego County Board of Supervisors committed a prejudicial abuse of discretion in granting project opponents’ appeals of the Planning Commission’s decision upholding County’s use of the CEQA Guidelines section 15183 exemption for a construction debris and inert materials recycling facility project. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
" But now Mikhail and others are invoking Section 788 to allege that Story was somehow being inc [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[Plaintiff's] supervisor also said [Plaintiff] made the right decision not to punish Student 2. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
It's not often that a case is thrown out because (1) the plaintiffs lack standing, (2) the case is moot, and (3) the case is not ripe. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:59 am by Jon Hyman
The lawsuit alleges that his supervisor denied his request to continue working from home after Covid work from home orders ended, despite most other employees continuing to work remotely. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Wage and Hour Division District Director Nicolas Ratmiroff warned, “Hospitality and food industry employers must understand that regardless of whether the employer is taking a tip credit, employers are prohibited from keeping employee tips or requiring that an employee give their tips to the employer, a supervisor, or manager [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
According to the EEOC, shortly after Blackwell hired the employee, a Blackwell supervisor told the employee that company policy required all employees be clean-shaven. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  her membership in a protected class and qualification for the position," she failed to [1] "adequately allege that she was treated differently or worse than her colleagues of other races, religions, and national origins under similar circumstances" and [2] "that the treatment occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  her membership in a protected class and qualification for the position," she failed to [1] "adequately allege that she was treated differently or worse than her colleagues of other races, religions, and national origins under similar circumstances" and [2] "that the treatment occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm by The White Law Group
  According to FINRA, Morgan Stanley failed to provide adequate guidance to representatives and supervisors, neglecting the importance of considering share-class differences. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:56 am by Lucie Gulino
The tort law legal claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), while applicable to any person, requires a plaintiff to prove (1) that the defendant either intended to cause the emotional distress or knew or should have known that their conduct would likely cause emotional distress, (2) that the defendant’s actions were so outrages they are “beyond all possible bounds of decency,” and (3) that the resulting distress was severe. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of McEvoy is distinguishable, as the petitioner in that appeal alleged that she was required to perform work outside of her tenure area without her consent, which is inherently unlawful (57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,198). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of McEvoy is distinguishable, as the petitioner in that appeal alleged that she was required to perform work outside of her tenure area without her consent, which is inherently unlawful (57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,198). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals majority agreed regarding (1), vacating defendant’s CCE conviction, but upheld the conspiracy to traffic methamphetamine conviction in (2). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
If true, the alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sexual harassment in the workplace. [read post]