Search for: "Sweets v. Martin" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
The Kat hosts a piece by DSM's Martin Kirk on a question that has been troubling some folk for a long time. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
 Published by: Sweet & MaxwellFormat: Hardback £520ISBN: 9780414078444Also available as an ebook. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justices Abella and Martin, in dissent, would allow the appeal, substantially for the reasons of Justice Pardu. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
How sweet, says Jeremy.* Forsgren's SPC: what does the marketing authorisation have to say about the active ingredient? [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
In this post, Professor Senftleben explains more in detail the content of the proposal.BGH gifts shape mark owners sweet victoriesThe German Federal Court of Justice once again confirmed its reputation for being the most shape mark-friendly court in Europe. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
And so too will the fine people of Prague, Doc Martin included.In Tinker v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
Blond; Anthony Pirone; Marysol Domenici; Lynette Sweet; Dr. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC published one adjudication this week: A married couple v Camberley News and Mail,  A married couple complained that an article headlined “Sweet result for Mica’s charity stall”, published in the Camberley News and Mail on 2 March 2012, had intruded into their teenage daughter’s privacy in breach of Clause 3 (Privacy) and Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors’ Code of Practice. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Judith G. McMullen
  Gradually, the pendulum swung towards defendants’ rights, and beginning with Coy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
Schwartz, Martin Shapiro, Herbert Stettin, and David L. [read post]