Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 21 - 40
of 304,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
T 724/05 [1 et seq.]; T 1206/06 [2]; T 1877/08 [1.2 et seq.]). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thereby, said statement gave detailed reasons why the decision under appeal should be set aside and indicated the facts and evidence in support of the respective arguments.R 99(2) does not exclude that such evidence is submitted for the first time in appeal proceedings nor does it require that this evidence is admitted into the proceedings (see T 389/95 [1,3]).Therefore, the fact that the [opponent] relied inter alia on documents D6 to D13 in its statement setting out the grounds for appeal… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
T 242/05 [2.1-3]). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”R 99(2) provides that “In the statement of grounds of appeal the appellants shall indicate the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned, or the extent to which it is to be amended and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based”.R 101(1) provides that “If the appeal does not comply with A 106 to A 108, R 97 or R 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as… [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
Kevin Murphy doesn’t espouse positions, even for money, that he hasn’t applied his copious analytical skills to evaluating first. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:24 am
T 621/12, Reasons, point 2). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:30 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 35 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor [2014] UKSC 35 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:17 am
Kötü niyetlilere göz açt? [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
Die Kammer hält die in der Entscheidung T 615/14 für die Übertragbarkeit der in der Entscheidung G 1/12 für die Anwendbarkeit der Regel 139 Satz 1 EPÜ hinsichtlich der Berichtigung des Beschwerdeführers genannten Begründung auf die Frage der Berichtigung der Bezeichnung der Einsprechenden für richtig und schließt sich dieser Begründung auch für das vorliegende Beschwerdeverfahren an. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
BESIDES, DEFENDANT DEMONSTRATED A COMMAND OF ENGLISH LANGUAGEAfter DR was convicted (upon his plea of guilty) of endangering the welfare of a child, DR sought to withdraw his guilty plea claiming that it hadn’t been “knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently” made, because an interpreter hadn’t been present. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 861/93 [5-6] and T 28/93 [4.1]). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
En outre, la combinaison en cause ne peut pas être considérée comme rendant l'objet de la revendication 1 de prime abord évidente. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Reasoning as in T 708/00, an objection under R 137(5) should not have been made. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 1:07 pm
“Importance of Monitoring Urine Output R/T UTI. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
Die Kammer hält eine Entscheidung über den Verlegungsantrag aus den folgenden Gründen für erforderlich:3.1 Wie bereits mehrfach entschieden, umfasst das Recht auf Anhörung in einer mündlichen Verhandlung als Unterfall des Anspruchs auf rechtliches Gehör nicht nur das Recht überhaupt gehört zu werden, sondern auch das Recht, seine Argumente am richtigen Ort präsentieren zu können (T 1012/03, Gründe Nr. 25;… [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:05 pm
Over the weekend, AT&T announced that it will acquire T-Mobile for cash and stock valued at about $39 billion. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
The requirements of R 99(1)(b) are thus met. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
An auxiliary request is a request that applies only if the main request or the auxiliary request of higher rank is not allowed (see T 153/85, T 79/89, T 169/96 and T 1105/96). [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
NB: Not long ago, T 830/08 found another allowable exception to R 43(6).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
