Search for: "T. V." Results 21 - 40 of 146,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm by Joe Tort
Judith Resnik has posted her latest piece, Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Massimiliano Kadar describes Case T-704/14 – Marine Harvest v Commission: On ‘Gun Jumping’ and Public Bids. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:47 am
Regina v T (Absent witness: Evidence) Court of Appeal “On an application for the admission of the statement of an absent witness, meeting the condition in section 116(2)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003 that the relevant person could not be found although such steps as it was reasonably practicable to take to find him had been taken, required [...] [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:05 am by sally
Regina (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Regina (R) Same [2012] EWHC 1115 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 126 “The decision of the Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis to issue and serve warning notices to those who had been accused of harassment or stalking by means of a Prevention of Harassment Letter or a Police Information Notice, and the retention of the documents or the underlying allegations in police records thereafter, could not give rise to any… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:10 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0009, 2009 MT 306N, IN THE MATTER OF CHANGE APPLICATION NO. 41S-30013940 BY T LAZY T RANCH, INC., Petitioner and Appellee, v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
T Mobile (UK) Ltd and another v Office of Communications [2008] EWCA Civ 1373; [2008] WLR (D) 391 “A challenge to a the decision of the Office of Communications (’Ofcom’) concerning the award of wireless telegraphy licences lay by way of a claim for judicial review and not an appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (’CAT’). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
26 May 2021, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Fulfilling the Conditions within Merger Commitments: Case T-430/18, American Airlines v Commission Jeremy Robinson The General Court’s ruling in American Airlines, Inc. v Commission has three distinct meanings. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:05 am
Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and another; Topping v Bench Town Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F T Everard & Sons Ltd and another [2007] UKHL 39 “A person who developed pleural plaques as a result of having been negligently exposed to asbestos in the course of his employment, could not sue his employers for negligence because the presence of pleural plaques did… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:04 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T [2008] EWCA Civ 199; [2008] WLR (D) 91 “A supervision order made pursuant to s 31 of and para 6 of Sch 3 to the Children Act 1989 had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]