Search for: "THE STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, ET AL. (Majority)"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Philip Morris USA, et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
