Search for: "THE STATE v. DEMPSEY" Results 21 - 40 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
"  Nor will the information sought in any forthcoming subpoenas be "pertinent" to any "stated legislative purpose. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
 Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Thomas, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, D.C., for amici Consumer Electronics Association, Digital Future Coalition, and Computer & Communications Industry Association. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am by Rick Houghton
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]