Search for: "THOMAS LETT"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
Lett, Barber v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
Lett, which I wrote about Sunday and was argued yesterday, and Berghuis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Thomas, the Court engaged in a tough process of statutory interpretation. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Thomas (09-5201) is how to interpret the federal law that provides up to 54 days "at the end of each year of the prisoner's term of imprisonment. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am
The Stacey sentence was deemed serious enough for the Council of Europe’s outgoing human rights Commissioner, Thomas Hammarberg, to weigh in with a comment. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm
Lett, and to join in similar opinions foreclosing relief in, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
At the Leveson Inquiry, we heard more from the ICO: former Information Commissioner Richard Thomas said he was glad that they did not prosecute journalists for using illegally obtained information. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
Thomas Docket: 09-5201 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: Did the federal Bureau of Prisons properly adopt a rule that inmates receive "good-time" credit based on their time served rather than the length of the sentence (which would provide greater credits)? [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
In 1796, Samuel Myles, a Federalist elector from Pennsylvania, cast one of his two votes for the Democratic-Republican presidential candidate Thomas Jefferson and apparently did not vote for his own party’s principal candidate, John Adams. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” Week of April 26, 2010: In Favor of the State or Government Thomas Douglas Arthur v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
So far, the Court has decided 33 of its argued cases this Term, including (as of yesterday) all cases argued during the October Sitting. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Lett, No. 09–338 (5/3/2010) “In a murder prosecution, a grant of petitioner’s habeas petition is reversed where it was reasonable for the Michigan Supreme Court to determine that the trial judge had exercised sound discretion in declaring a mistrial, and thus the state court’s decision was not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law under a proper application of the AEDPA’s deferential standard of review. [read post]
