Search for: "THOMPSON v. WILSON" Results 21 - 40 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 11 March 2020 the Supreme Court (Lords Wilson, Briggs and Kitchin) has granted Google LLC permission to appeal against the order of the Court of Appeal in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) granting the representative claimant permission serve a representative claim out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:08 am by John Floyd
  The following are examples of law enforcement testifying purely as “expert” witnesses under Rule 702:   Thompson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Blog has coverage. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38 [2006]; see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]). [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Events 17 March 2018 The Media Democracy Festival, 10am-6pm, Birkbeck, University of London, Torrington Square, London WC1E 7JL Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the aftermath of Rebel Wilson’s defamation case against Bauer Media many outlets have reported on the fact Wilson allegedly spent $1.4m on the case. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Thompson v Plymouth Herald IPSO dismissed a complaint based on clause 2 (privacy). [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
 See Ex parte Thompson, 442 S.W.3d 325, 333 (Tex. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Rebel Wilson’s lawyer has said that her motivation for filing her defamation claim was to restore her damaged reputation. [read post]