Search for: "TUCKER v. STATE OF MAINE" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
Benoit's computer was on and open to the main desktop page. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But in the main, her solutions to the democratic deficit lie elsewhere. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm by Lydia Estep
He is co-chair of the firm’s litigation group, supervising several lawyers, and he has served as an attorney for local and national clients in federal and state court litigation and arbitration matters, as well as in bankruptcy proceedings, TTAB disputes (trademark Notice of Opposition and trademark Petition to Cancel proceedings), domain name disputes (ACPA, UDRP, and URS proceedings), government contract bid protests and Tucker Act litigation, and numerous other forums and… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
In Defense One, Patrick Tucker describes how the Burr-Feinstein encryption resembles Chinese law. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
Last week, as he tried to contain the media fallout from his summit with Putin, Trump provided perhaps the most unvarnished picture to date of how he views the NATO alliance, stating the following in an interview with Tucker Carlson of Fox News: CARLSON: Membership in NATO obligates the members to defend any other member who has been attacked. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:30 am
In conclusion, to a certain extent ITAR makes resolution of a commercial space-related reinsurance issue complicated and time consuming, but if well-managed it should not preclude resolution of any such issue.Stephen Tucker, Senior Partner at Mendes & Mount LLP, expanded on the US regulation of space tourism. [read post]