Search for: "Take One Inc v. Discovery Financial Services Inc et al" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami has also taken steps toward eliminating one entire tier of supervisors within the Enforcement Division in an effort to reduce the levels of review. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Think Tank) (The IP ADR Blog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) 50 years of scientific discovery and sharing in Antarctica may end thanks to patent greed (Techdirt) Take steps to limit the impact of licensee’s economic woes (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia TMO delegate allows ‘ElvisFinance’ covering financial services to proceed to registration despite opposition: Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc… [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Wal-Mart including an analysis of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The arbitrator granted appellees’ summary-judgment motion and entered an award that appellants take nothing on their claims.Appellants filed a new lawsuit to vacate the arbitration award. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm by Michael Lowe
  Finally, these online transactions are very conducive for international transactions that may take significantly longer in more traditional financial dealings. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]