Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 1,467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Just as, for example, a plaintiff can't potentially assert non-mutual offensive issue preclusion when she was the one who strategically split up the two cases, so too should a defendant not be permitted to claim lack of incentive/opportunity to litigate with respect to defensive issue preclusion when he's the one who elected to split up the cases in the first place.That's my take, anyway. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  And although a grand jury has charged Trump with several criminal offenses related to those efforts, that indictment does not include an alleged violation of the criminal “insurrection” statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
So who can blame California Rep. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
He reiterates his challenge to the failure to instruct on lesser included offenses, and the Court of Appeal -- not surprisingly -- follows the California's Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Delilah Diaz was stopped returning from Mexico to her home in California. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am by SHG
Here are the relevant statutory provisions, from the California Labor Code (dating back to 1937): 1101. [read post]