Search for: "Target Australia Pty Ltd." Results 21 - 40 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Singapore Court has indicated in Re Vanguard Energy Pty Ltd[ii] that the categories of claims for which litigation funding is permitted is not fixed and that so long as the administration of justice and the interest of vulnerable litigants are protected, the categories may be expanded on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has adopted Guidelines (8/2020) on the targeting of social media users under GDPR. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:12 am by Mark Summerfield
In what might well be the final word on the scope and effect of so-called ‘Swiss type’ claims in Australia – at least for the foreseeable future – an enlarged panel of five judges of the Federal Court has clarified what is required for infringement of this form of claim: Mylan Health Pty Ltd v Sun Pharma ANZ Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 116. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Nicholas Saady
Australian Multiple-Person LiabilityThere is no doctrine of joint employment as such in Australia. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236 Thawley J dismissed two libel claims concerning a Golden Girls parody puppet show. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Australia In Australia, the common law of privacy has not developed quite as far. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:21 pm by Peta Willoughby and Matt Wichlinski
Highlighting the significant risks for employers, Tad-Mar Electrical Pty Ltd (Tad-Mar) was this month fined $15,000 ( the maximum penalty is $500,000) after pleading guilty to the Category 3 offence of contravening section 33 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2012 (SA) (WHS Act). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:20 am by Harrison Ottaway
Takeaways There are a number of important takeaways from the decision Blocking orders will be available against a range of infringing online locations: since its introduction in 2015, s 115A has been used to disable access to unauthorised torrent websites (Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Telstra Corp Ltd [2016] FCA 1503, Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 435) streaming platforms (Foxtel Management… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:20 am by Harrison Ottaway
Takeaways There are a number of important takeaways from the decision Blocking orders will be available against a range of infringing online locations: since its introduction in 2015, s 115A has been used to disable access to unauthorised torrent websites (Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Telstra Corp Ltd [2016] FCA 1503, Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 435) streaming platforms (Foxtel Management… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Joe Whitworth
Ltd., Bridgewater Poultry Eggs, Ash and Son Eggs, and Glendenning Farms. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 6:02 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
In ACCC v Advanced Medical Institute Pty Ltd[1], Ian Turpie, who hosted The New Price is Right, gave a testimonial in an advertisement that an erectile dysfunction spray had restored his sexual potency. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 6:02 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
In ACCC v Advanced Medical Institute Pty Ltd[1], Ian Turpie, who hosted The New Price is Right, gave a testimonial in an advertisement that an erectile dysfunction spray had restored his sexual potency. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 8:08 pm by Mark Summerfield
  These issues were recently considered by Justice Jagot in the Federal Court decision Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v Generic Health Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 250, who confirmed that ‘the words “reasonable skill and knowledge” require the specification as framed to be in the form in which a person, with reasonable skill in drafting patent specifications and a knowledge of the relevant law and practice, would produce given the patentee's knowledge of the… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:27 pm by Mark Summerfield
  (For more information, see Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [No 3] [2012] FCA 1019, and my earlier article Innovation Patents Reach Back in Time for Infringement.)Innovation patents are currently under attack from a number of quarters, and it is no secret that a number of authorities would like to see the system abolished altogether. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
There are allegations that the target companies sold adulterated meat products. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 2:48 am by Mark Summerfield
  A recent judgment in CQMS Pty Ltd v Bradken Resources Pty Limited [2016] FCA 847 reconfirms the position that any allegation of infringement which eventually turns out to have been incorrect (no matter how reasonably and sincerely believed) will be treated as an unjustified threat under the Australian law. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the recent Australian case of Rachael Roberts v VIEW Launceston Pty Ltd  [2015] FWC 6556, the Fair Work Commission, Australia’s workplace tribunal, held that the act of one employee removing a colleague from her list of friends on Facebook following a workplace dispute was unreasonable behaviour amounting to workplace bullying. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 Media Law in Other Jurisdictions  Australia At the conclusion of the trial of the claim of “sports scientist” Stephen Dank, McCallum J gave judgment for the plaintiff on one of three articles but awarded no damages (Dank v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 295) The jury found that two articles published in the Daily Telegraph in 2013 that included a report that questioned whether an NRL player’s cancer relapse could be linke [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:37 am by Afro Leo
The case is Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54 (24 June 2015) . [read post]