Search for: "Target Employee 1" Results 21 - 40 of 6,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Now, a new state law in California, which goes into effect July 1, makes those charges illegal. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:31 am by Holly
The period of time the payments are to be held in escrow or held back by the buyer is typically 1 – 2 years. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
Stay tuned for a follow-up post on this topic specifically targeted at grantmakers. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:13 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
  An independent contractor is not considered an employee and is not entitled to the same protections and benefits as employees. [read post]
” Healthcare professionals can continue to temporarily provide hormone treatments and puberty blockers to minors who are prescribed such treatment before August 1, 2024. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:25 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
  PREVIOUS COVERAGE:  Fontanoza had been on disability leave but was scheduled to return to work on June 1, 2024. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:27 am by Yosi Yahoudai
An estimated 1 million turned out in 2020 for processions for the late Revolutionary Guard Gen. [read post]
21 May 2024, 3:18 am by Yosi Yahoudai
An estimated 1 million turned out in 2020 for processions for the late Revolutionary Guard Gen. [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:34 pm by Michael Lowe
These people may become (1) witnesses providing sworn testimony in the AUSA’s case; (2) persons of interest; (3) subjects; (4) targets; or (5) an arrested accused. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:53 pm by Ginger Buck
According to the DOJ’s announcement, the employee (1) agreed with competing sports equipment distributors and others to “submit complementary bids to schools … to obtain procurements for school sports equipment and related services”; and (2) agreed to submit “false bids,” “used an unidentified individual’s identity without authorization,” and “forg[ed] the individual’s signature. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm by bklemm@foley.com
A recent crop of ERISA class actions has also targeted a set of de-risking deals conducted in recent years by three large companies, alleging their employer’s choice of the same private equity-linked annuity provider to annuitize their pension obligations was not the safest available choice as Interpretive Bulletin 95-1 requires. 4. [read post]
16 May 2024, 11:56 am by Dirk Auer
Finally, none of these deals entail any competitively significant behavioral commitments from the target companies. [read post]