Search for: "Tate, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Still Slapped with Campaign Finance Charge, Prosecutors Say ABC News – Aaron Katersky and Max Zahn | Published: 8/8/2023 Federal prosecutors signaled their intention to hold cryptocurrency executive Sam Bankman-Fried accountable for alleged campaign finance violations despite dropping the charge on a technicality. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
(Editor’s Note: This article also appears in Transnational Litigation Blog.) [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 10:07 am
The post “Clarence Thomas’s $267,230 R.V. and the Friend Who Financed It; The vehicle is a key part of the justice’s just-folks persona; It’s also a luxury motor coach that was funded by someone else’s money” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
" In fact, the library's selection criteria policy did not even make the list of items that must be submitted to the governing body on appeal. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:33 am
Undeterred, Tate appealed the decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Christina [Maguire], for that introduction and congratulations on becoming President and CEO of the Society [for Corporate Governance] (the “Society”) this past January. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:24 pm
appeared first on Tate Law Offices, PC. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:21 am
HELD: The Supreme Court unanimously rejects the appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
“[S]tate courts are the ultimate expositors of state law. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Because we hold that the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause as applied to the [S]tates through the Fourteenth Amendment does not provide a right of action for takings claims against a [S]tate, we VACATE the district court's decision and REMAND for further proceedings. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
The result was a split decision 3/2, with the majority allowing the appeal and the minority upholding the first instance decision (though not the court of appeal decision). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
On 17 February 2023, the high court refused special leave to appeal two aspects of a federal court decision overturning an earlier judgment. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
The film concerns the culture of the late 1960s in Hollywood and the Manson family murder of Tate. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am
The judgment being appealed can be found at [2021] EWCA Civ 299. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
All three of Mr Sivier’s grounds of appeal were rejected and it was held that the appeal has no real prospect of success; permission to appeal was refused. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (2023) UKSC 4 – can ‘visual intrusion’ by overlooking amount to actionable nuisance? [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am
On appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 104 The Tate Modern (the Tate), a public art gallery in London, opened a new extension in 2016 called the Blavatnik Building. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The Court will determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to hold that the claimants were entitled to a remedy in the tort of private nuisance by reason of the Tate Modern’s use of the top floor of its Blavatnik Building as a viewing platform. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am
The Court of Appeals found no error. [read post]
