Search for: "Taylor v. C "
Results 21 - 40
of 1,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Superior Court ex rel Taylor, A154973 (Cal. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:52 am
This was the issue raised by David C. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
The US Supreme Court Tuesday heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
See, e.g., Estrada-Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
Contents include:ArticlesRandle C. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
Reeves Taylor (U.K. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:54 am
Taylor G. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:01 am
Taylor, 2010 U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Taylor would have pushed harder on the viewpoint-discriminatory effect of Section 1052(c). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 N.Y.3d 302John Park, a police officer employed by the Town of Greenburgh, underwent surgery in June 2002 after sustaining an injury in the line of duty. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for parking on city… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
Davis (which found Section 924(c)’s “residual clause” unconstitutional) and earlier this year in Borden v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:31 am
Bierman, Jacob Geesing, Pratima Lele, Tayyaba C. [read post]
